Kunal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76477 of 2024

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-565 Year-2024 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna

======================================================

Kunal Kumar S/o- Late Naresh Kumar Gupta Resident of Mohalla- RPS More Sarjug Sadan Apartment Lane No- 3 PS-Rupaspur District- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Smt. Sujata Gupta @ Sujata Kumari D/o- Ajay Kumar, W/o- Kunal Kumar Moh- Dujra Ps- Budha colony Dist- Patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivanand Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶12

Date : 16-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned counsel for the respondents.

¶14

The present quashing petition has been preferred to quash the FIR bearing Danapur P.S. Case No. 565 of 2024

¶15

District Patna for the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 354(C), 341, 323, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted that daughter Kavya, who is the only female child is with petitioner from the very beginning. It is also submitted that O.P. No. 2 did not supported the mediation proceeding, which is one of the reason for its failure.

¶17

Taking contrary note it is pointed out by

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76477 of 2024 dt.16-06-2025 2/3

¶19

learned counsel appearing for O.P. No. 2 that submission as advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is apparently false as he filed Guardianship Case No. 02 of 2025 before the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna for the custody of daughter Kavya.

¶20

It is submitted that aforesaid petition was filed making statement on affidavit that daughter Kavya was not in custody of petitioner being father. It is submitted that on 27.05.2025 petitioner alongwith certain unknown persons entered in the house of O.P. No. 2 and forcibly took her daughter. It is submitted that for said inter parental kidnapping of female child, the FIR was lodged by O.P. No. 2 on the same very day, which is being registered as Budha Colony P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025 dated 28.05.2025.

¶21

It is further submitted by learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 that allegation of committing cruelty is specific against petitioner being husband. It is also pointed out that the issues as raised by learned counsel for the petitioner cannot be looked into, at this stage as issues are raised in defence, which can be looked into only during trial. In support

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76477 of 2024 dt.16-06-2025 3/3

¶23

of his submissions learned counsel relied upon the legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court as available through State Vs.

¶24

Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi and Others as reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1215.

¶25

In view of aforesaid factual and legal discussions as mediation proceeding failed between the parties, where petitioner being husband is also facing allegation of inter parental kidnapping as discussed aforesaid, coupled with fact as issues which are raised by petitioner, in support of his defence cannot be looked at this stage as same can looked only during the course of trial in view of Chakravarthi Case (supra) , accordingly present quashing petition stands dismissed being devoid of any merit.

¶26

TCR (Trial Court Records), if any, be returned

¶27

to the learned Trial Court alongwith the copy of this judgment.

¶28

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶29

S.Tripathi/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	18.06.2025
Transmission Date	18.06.2025

Kunal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kunal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Patel @ Anil Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Kharpati Devi @ Kharpatiya Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Aakash Jaiswal Vs Sakshi Jaiswal

Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Ajay Ray @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mohammad Imran Vs The State of Bihar