Md. Mahboob Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kanchan Jha, Advocate For the Informant/s : Ms. Patla Kumari, Advocate Mr. Akhouri Vipin Bihari Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 05-02-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned counsel

¶13

for the informant and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 376, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 6/17 of POCSO Act.

¶15

The case of the prosecution is that when the informant used to go for harvesting, the petitioner started talking with her. One day he committed rape with her. When the informant started weeping, she was threatened and was promised to marry.

¶16

It is further alleged that on the said promise, the petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72559 of 2024(6) dt.05-02-2025 2/3

¶18

established physical relationship many times and whenever the informant asked for marriage, he denied.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioner is still ready to marry the informant. From perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the informant was major and they were talking terms due to which they had physical relation. It is also clear that despite being sexually assaulted many times, she has not reported it to anybody which shows the consent of the informant. Moreover, it is a case of sexual intercourse on promise of marriage. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.06.2024.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Chhatapur, Supaul P.S. Case No. 322 of 2023 on furnishing bail

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72559 of 2024(6) dt.05-02-2025 3/3

¶23

bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ADJ-VI-cum Special Judge-POCSO Court, Supaul.

¶24

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

Sudhanshu/-

¶26

U T

Md. Mahboob v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Mahboob v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Vishnu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rashid Shah Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Irshad Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar