Petitioners' counsel sought withdrawal of a quashing application arising from a complaint case because the stage of trial had changed. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn, granting liberty to avail an appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72109 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1275 Year-2016 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sayed Imran Ghani, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP. For O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL ORDER
dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
mantreshwar/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing application could be permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty to pursue an appropriate remedy, given that the stage of trial had changed.
Most. Rani Gupta @ Rani Kumari
Sudhir Kumar
State of Bihar
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
