Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar @ Sushli Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 07-10-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 (2), 115 (2), 303 (2), 308 (2), 324 (4), 352, 351 (2), 3 (5) of the BNS.

¶16

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner no. 1 allegedly pointed a revolver at the informant while petitioner no. 2 allegedly took an amount of Rs. 48,000/- from the box of a tempo and further threatened that he would have to pay Rs. 60,000/- as ' Rangdari ’ per month.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69690 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/2

¶19

there is also counter version of this case and in fact, no such incident as alleged ever took place. The petitioner no. 1 has been framed in this case as he is having criminal antecedent of 12 cases whereas petitioner no. 2 is having criminal antecedent of two cases. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioners. Moreover, the petitioners have been languishing in judicial custody since 28.06.2025

¶20

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶21

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Baijnathpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Saharsa.

¶22

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Jagdish/-

Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar @ Sushli Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushil Yadav @ Sushil Kumar @ Sushli Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Uditya Kumar @ Aditya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suren @ Surendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Randhir Ram @ Randhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Kumar @ Mahendra Kumar Meena @ Mahendra Kumar Mina Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar