Md. Sonu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Apr 2025CR. MISC./69528/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CR. MISC. No.69528 of 2024, dt. 22-04-2025, Sourendra Pandey, J.: regular bail granted to petitioner Md. Sonu in Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 66 of 2023 (District Vaishali) — charges u/s 323, 341, 354B, 504 read with Section 34 IPC and Section ¾ POCSO Act — parity/bail already granted to similarly situated co-accused by coordinate Bench (Annexure-3); custody since 19.02.2024; general and omnibus allegation contention; informant and State opposition noting compromise between parties; bail-bond Rs. 10,000/- with two like sureties; application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Vaishali, in Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 66 of 2023. ¶¶23

Md. Sonu Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69528 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2023 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Sonu S/o Md. Pappu R/o vill - Sherpur Mohabbatpur, P.S. - Ganga Bridge, Distt. - Vaishali (Hajipur)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Zinnat Kumari D/o Late Katiman Khalifa R/o vill - Sherpur, P.S. - Ganga Bridge, Distt. - Vaishali

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lovekush Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Bireshwar Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pushpa Sinha, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 22-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶13

counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶15

grant of regular bail in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 66 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 323, 341, 354B, 504 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and Section ¾ of the POCSO Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and three others co-accused persons are alleged to have outraged the modesty of the victim and also alleged to have assaulted the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69528 of 2024(3) dt.22-04-2025 2/3

¶18

informant.

¶19

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and from perusal of the F.I.R., it is evident that there is a general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is further submitted that no specific overt act of assault has been attributed to the petitioner. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and is in custody since 19.02.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned APP for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and have stated that the matter has been compromised between the parties

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the orders passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court which has been brought on record by way of Annexure- 3 whereby similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail, let the petitioner abovenamed, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Vaishali, in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 66 of 2023.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69528 of 2024(3) dt.22-04-2025 3/3

¶23

7. The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

¶25

Jyoti/-

¶26

U T

Md. Sonu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Sonu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Kumar Sahni @ Ritesh Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Surya Narayan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Sanjay Singh @ Bablu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shital Ravidas @ Shital Kumar Vs The State of Bihar