Pinku Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 07-02-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶12

petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶13

State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 375 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 33, 34 and 36 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

¶15

Act.

¶16

The accused/petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶17

and is in custody since 12.08.2024.

¶18

The allegation against the petitioner is to involve

¶19

in illegal activities of illicit liquor alongwith other co-accused persons, where after consumption brother of the informant

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6941 of 2025(2) dt.07-02-2025 2/3

¶21

died.

¶22

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the name of petitioner surfaced in present case during the course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Arbind Yadav, where no incriminating material recovered/surfaced during the course of investigation as to connect this petitioner with present occurrence. It is submitted that as petitioner found involved in 21 cases of similar nature, his name also implicated with present case only on the basis of suspicion arises out of those 21 criminal antecedents, where in almost all cases, name of the petitioner surfaced on the basis of confessional statement, as of the present case. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation of this case has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶23

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as save and except confessional statement of co-accused no incriminating material recovered/surfaced to

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6941 of 2025(2) dt.07-02-2025 3/3

¶26

connect this petitioner with present occurrence of illegal trading of alleged spurious liquor, which cause death of the brother of informant coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted, where petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2024, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Nawada P.S. Case No. 375 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-1st, Nawada/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C./Section 480(2) of the BNSS.

¶27

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶28

S.Tripathi/-

¶29

U T

Pinku Yadav @ Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pinku Yadav @ Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Fuldeo Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Bashki Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Patel @ Bhaiya Ji Vs The State of Bihar