Allowed¶22

Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 – Sections 30(a) and 41

Patna HC24 Sept 2025CR. MISC./64982/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted under Ss. 30(a) and 41, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018; Baijnathpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, Saharsa; 60 liters Codin Syrup recovered from Swift car; petitioner named in confessional statement of apprehended persons; no recovery from conscious possession; custody since 03.07.2025; four criminal antecedents alleged by State; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties; condition against similar offences; Patna High Court, Ashok Kumar Pandey, J.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, with a condition not to indulge in similar nature of cases in future. ¶22

Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64982 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- Baijnathpur District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek Kumar S/o Upendra Bhagat R/o vill D.B. Road, Machhali Market, P.S.- Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 24-09-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 30 (a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶17

3. The case of the prosecution is that it is alleged that from a Swift car three persons, namely Rajesh Kumar Ram, Akash Kumar Singh and Prasanjit Bhatacharya were apprehended and on search altogether 60 liters of Codin Syrup was recovered from a Swift Car.

¶18

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner was not apprehended on the spot. His name has

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64982 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2

¶20

surfaced on the confessional statement of apprehended persons. It is also submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.07.2025.

¶21

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail stating that that petitioner has four criminal antecedents.

¶22

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Baijnathpur P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special (Excise) Judge-I, Saharsa with a condition that the petitioner shall not indulge himself in similar nature of case in future.

¶23

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

Jagdish/-

¶25

U T

Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Twinkle Bhagat @ Vivek Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tulsi Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Ramod Kumar @ Ramod Sahani @ Ramod Kumar Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mekail @ Mekail Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Rai @ Bhaukal @ Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar