Disposed¶22

Ajeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Sept 2025CR. MISC./64055/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail modification application; extension by three weeks of time for payment by demand draft under settlement schedule before Patna High Court Mediation Center; consequential extension of time for surrender in Gaya Complaint Case No.926 of 2023; Cr. Misc. No.64055 of 2025 arising out of Cr. Misc. No.77491 of 2024; Patna High Court; Soni Shrivastava, J.; order dated 12-09-2025 disposing of modification application.

What did the court decide?

Extension by another three weeks of the time for payment through demand draft, with modification of the order dated 25.06.2025 to that extent, and consequential extension by another three weeks of the time for surrender before the learned Court below in connection with Gaya Complaint Case No.926 of 2023. ¶22

Ajeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether, the petitioner having failed to make payment under the agreed schedule within time due to delay in arranging money and refusal of the Bank for want of a cheque book (since received), the time for payment through demand draft under the order dated 25.06.2025, and consequentially the time for surrender before the learned Court below, should be extended.

¶19

Court's answer

Time for payment through demand draft is extended by another three weeks and the order dated 25.06.2025 is modified to that extent.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

Consequently, the time for surrender before the learned Court below in connection with Gaya Complaint Case No.926 of 2023 is extended by another three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Patna — Criminal Miscellaneous No.64055 of 2025, arising out of Criminal Miscellaneous No.77491 of 2024 (PS Case No.926/2023, Gaya Complaint Case, District Gaya); oral order dated 12-09-2025 by Hon'ble Smt. Justice Soni Shrivastava. Anticipatory bail had been granted to the petitioner, Ajeet Kumar, by order dated 25.06.2025 on the ground that a settlement had been arrived at between the parties in the proceeding before the Patna High Court Mediation Center upon an agreed schedule of payment. Payment could not be made within time due to time taken for arrangement of money and refusal of the Bank in the absence of a cheque book; the petitioner has since received the cheque book and is in a position to pay by way of demand draft. The modification application was disposed of: the time for payment through demand draft was extended by another three weeks and the order dated 25.06.2025 modified to that extent; consequently, the time for surrender before the learned Court below in connection with Gaya Complaint Case No.926 of 2023 was likewise extended by another three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64055 of 2025

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77491 of 2024

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-926 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Ajeet Kumar S/o- Suresh Sharma Village- Dihuri PS- Atri Dist-Gaya

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Soni Kumari W/o- Ajeet Kumar, D/o- Anil Mistri Village- Dihuri PS- Atri Dist-Gaya

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brijeshwar Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 12-09-2025

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶17

APP for the State.

¶18

By order dated 25.06.2025, the anticipatory bail had been granted to the petitioner on the ground that a settlement had been arrived at between the parties in the proceeding before the Patna High Court Mediation Center upon an agreed schedule of payment.

¶19

It is submitted that due to time taken for arrangement of money and refusal of the Bank in absence of the cheque book, the same could not be done within time. However, the petitioner has now received the cheque book and is in a position to make the payment by way of demand draft.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64055 of 2025(2) dt.12-09-2025 2/2

¶21

In such view of the matter, the time for payment through demand draft is, thus, extended by another three weeks and the order dated 25.06.2025 is modified to that extent and, consequently, the time for surrender before the learned Court below in connection with Gaya Complaint Case No.926 of 2023 is also extended by another three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

Accordingly, this modification application stands disposed of.

¶23

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

¶24

Trivedi/-

¶25

U T

Ajeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwa Prakash Singh @ Vishwa Prakash Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar @ Guddu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Pancham Mehta @ Pancham Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar