Dismissed¶22

Md. Intiyar @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Mister v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Regular bail

Patna HC3 Jul 2025CR. MISC./6192/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Md. Intiyar @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Mister v. The State of Bihar & Chandani Khatoon; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.6192 of 2025; decided 03-07-2025; Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey; regular bail rejected; Section 69 BNS; Section 183 BNSS statement; Fulwaria P.S. Case No. 174 of 2024, District Begusarai; petitioner in custody since 14.10.2024; trial commenced, two witnesses examined; trial court directed to conclude trial within four months on day-to-day basis; advocates: Vinod Gautam (petitioner), Mohammad Sufyan A.P.P. (State).

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned trial court to expedite the trial on a day-to-day basis and conclude it within four months. ¶22

Md. Intiyar @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Mister Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6192 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2024 Thana- PHULWARIA District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Intiyar @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Mister S/o Md. Razzaque Resident of villagePapraur, ward no 02, PS- Barauni, Distt.- Begusarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Chandani Khatoon D/o Md. Kayum R/o Fulwaria 01 Ganj, ward no. 20, P.S. - Fulwaria, Distt.- Begusarai

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mohammad Sufyan, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 03-07-2025

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Fulwaria P.S. Case No. 174 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Section 69 of B.N.S.

¶16

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the petitioner had enticed her in a love track and had forcibly made physical relationship and when she had asked him to marry, he denied and thereafter he forcibly entered into the house of the informant, however, the police was called and he was apprehended.

¶17

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated and there is admittedly a love affair between the petitioner and the victim girl. It has also been submitted that from the statement made under Section 183 B.N.S.S.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6192 of 2025(4) dt.03-07-2025 2/2

¶19

of the victim, it would be clear that she had shown her intent to marry the petitioner. It has next been submitted that petitioner has clean antecedent and is in custody since 14.10.2024.

¶20

5. The learned counsel for the Informant as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has stated that the trial has begun and two witnesses have been examined. It has also been submitted that from the report of the learned trial court, it would be evident that the trial would be completed within three months.

¶21

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and taking into account that the trial is at its fag end, I am not inclined grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail.

¶22

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.

¶23

8. The learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial on day to day basis and conclude the trial within a period of four months.

¶24

(Sourendra Pandey, J)

¶25

Siwani/-

Md. Intiyar @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Mister v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Intiyar @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Mister v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kunj Bihari Sah @ Kunj Bihari Vs The State of Bihar

Ghanshyam Tiwari @ Ghanshaym Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Rangesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Premchand Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Mandal Vs The State of Bihar