Allowed¶21

Banti Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jan 2025CR. MISC./612/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CR. MISC. No.612 of 2025; bail granted; Arms Act Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35; desi katta; used cartridges; Maner P.S. Case No. 594 of 2024; Section 103 Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita 2023; custody since 05.09.2024; no criminal antecedent; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties; Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.; oral order dated 20-01-2025

What did the court decide?

Both petitioners released on bail in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 594 of 2024 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court. ¶21

Banti Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.612 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-594 Year-2024 Thana- MANER District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Banti Kumar S/O Shambhu Pandit R/O Village- Mehadauli, Ward No.9, P.SBhagwanpur, Dist.- Begusarai.

¶5

Ashok Kumar S/O Shiv Yadav R/O Village- Jalalpur Bandhu Bigha, P.STekari, Distt.- Gaya (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-01-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 594 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶15

As per the F.I.R., one desi katta and two used cartridges have been recovered from the room of this petitioner.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioners have got no concern with the recovered arms and

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.612 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2025 2/2

¶18

ammunitions. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 05.09.2024 and have no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 594 of 2024.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/-

¶24

U T

Banti Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banti Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sipak Kumar Chaudhary @ Siphak Kr. Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Sudarshan Mishra Vs The State of Bihar