Allowed¶19

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Sept 2025CR. MISC./59100/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court anticipatory bail 2025; Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar; CR. MISC. No.59100 of 2025; Madhuban P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025 dated 12.03.2025, Thana Madhuban, District East Champaran; BNS 2023 sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 333, 109, 76, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3); Section 482(2) BNSS bail conditions; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; no criminal antecedent; no earlier bail application; Justice Jitendra Kumar; APP Md. Aslam Ansari.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner to be enlarged on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023 conditions and the two stated cancellation conditions. ¶19

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶19

Issue for consideration

Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner, who apprehends arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025 registered under eleven provisions of BNS, 2023.

¶12

Court's answer

This Court allowed the anticipatory bail petition and directed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within eight weeks, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to the conditions of Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023 and two further cancellation conditions.

¶19

Ratio / Principle

The bail was made conditional: the court below is to cancel the bail bonds if satisfied that the petitioner concealed his criminal antecedents despite knowledge of them, and likewise if his statement regarding a previous bail petition is found to be wrong.

¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail granted (Patna High Court, CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59100 of 2025, order dated 10-09-2025, Jitendra Kumar, J.) to Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh apprehending arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025 dated 12.03.2025 (East Champaran), registered for offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 333, 109, 76, 303(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023. Counsel pleaded innocence, absence of any specific allegation of assault by the petitioner, no criminal antecedent and no earlier bail application; learned APP opposed. Bail allowed: enlargement on arrest or surrender within eight weeks on bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two like sureties, subject to Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023 conditions and cancellation conditions for concealed antecedents or a wrong statement regarding a previous bail petition.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59100 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh S/O Mithlesh Singh, VillageBanjariya, P.S.- Madhuban, Dist.- East Champaran at Motihari

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-09-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025, dated 12.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 333, 109, 76, 303(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023.

¶13

As per allegation, the husband of the informant has been assaulted by co-accused persons.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation of assault by the petitioner against the informant or her family members.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59100 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3

¶16

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

¶17

It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023, and on the following conditions:

¶20

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59100 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3

¶22

concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.

¶23

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶24

(Jitendra Kumar, J.)

¶25

ravishankar/-

¶26

U T

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Tanwir @ Tanwir Azad Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Sanjeewan Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sushma Devi Vs the State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Police Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Pappu Bhuiyan @ Pappu Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Harnan Gaddi @ Harinand Gaddi Vs The State of Bihar