Disposed¶19

Pratap Kumar Jain v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Dec 2025CR. MISC./5881/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.5881 of 2025 (Pratap Kumar Jain v. The State of Bihar & Anr.), decided 11-12-2025 by Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. Petition sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Rampravesh Yadav (O.P. No. 2) by the Sessions Judge, Saharsa on 20.11.2024 in A.B.P. No. 823 of 2024, arising out of Complaint Case No. 63C of 2023. Disposed of on petitioner's submission with a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial; no adjudication on the merits of cancellation. No statute or precedent cited in the order.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial and take steps for early disposal of the case; no order on cancellation of anticipatory bail. ¶19

Pratap Kumar Jain Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5881 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pratap Kumar Jain Son of Late Hanumanmal Sethia, Proprietor of Jai Hanuman Handloom Kapra Patti, P.O. - Sahara, P.S. - Saharsa Sadar, District – Saharsa.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Rampravesh Yadav Son of Late Jagdish Yadav Resident of Village - Kanp, P.S. - Saurbazar, District - Saharsa, at present Bittu Readymade, Saur Bazar, P.S. - Saur Bazar, District – Saharsa.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 11-12-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The present Criminal Miscellaneous petition has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to O.P. No. 2, vide order dated 20.11.2024 passed in A.B.P. No. 823 of 2024, arising out of Complaint Case No. 63C of 2023 by the learned Sessions Judge, Saharsa.

¶15

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5881 of 2025(3) dt.11-12-2025 2/2

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this

¶18

prayer of the petitioner.

¶19

In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this case is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial and take steps for early disposal of the case.

¶20

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.)

¶21

rakhi/-

¶22

U T

Pratap Kumar Jain v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratap Kumar Jain v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarjan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Bihari Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Rambha Devi @ Rambha Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Priyanka Kumari Vs The State of Bihar