Baijnath Saw @ Baidyanath Sah @ Baijnath Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Court: Patna High Court | Case: CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58503 of 2018, decided 16-09-2025 | Coram: Purnendu Singh, J (author) | Petitioner: Baijnath Saw @ Baidyanath Sah @ Baijnath Sah (Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, Advocate) | Opposite Party: State of Bihar (Ajit Kumar, APP) | Statutes: Section 482 Cr.P.C.; Section 239 Cr.P.C.; Sections 420, 406 and 504/34 IPC | Procedural trail: Kotwali P.S. Case No. 62 of 2015 (G.R. No. 478/2015), Munger -> CJM order 21.07.2015 -> Cri. Rev. No. 45/2017, Sessions Judge Munger refused Section 239 petition on 19.07.2018 | Outcome: quashing application consigned with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as trial reached evidence stage (District Court letter dated 29.08.2025) | Keywords: quashing, Section 239 discharge petition, trial at evidence stage, consigned application.
What did the court decide?
Quashing application consigned (not decided on merits) with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, in view of the trial having reached the evidence stage.