Allowed¶16

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Aug 2025CR. MISC./58128/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Section 309(4) BNS; robbery/loot of Rs.45,000 cash and jewellery; Vaishali P.S. Case No.267 of 2025; custody since 09.05.2025; charge-sheet submitted; no TIP; five criminal antecedents; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties; condition of attendance on all trial dates; Patna High Court Crim. Misc. No.58128 of 2025; decision dated 27-08-2025; Judge Ramesh Chand Malviya; petitioner Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray; State of Bihar opposed.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, with a condition that the petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial. ¶16

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58128 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2025 Thana- VAISHALI District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray, aged about-25 years, male, S/O Mahendra Ray R/O Village- Bhagwanpur Ratti (Shahjahanpur), P.S.- Vaishali, DistrictVaishali.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S.

¶11

As per the allegation in the FIR, when the informant and his wife went to attend a marriage ceremony then on their way, petitioner along with other co-accused person came and looted a bag from the informant including total Rs.45,000/- cash along with gold chain and mangalsutra .

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that investigation has already concluded and accordingly charge-sheet has been submitted and no TIP has been conducted by the Investigating Officer during the

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58128 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2

¶14

investigation. He further submits that FIR is against the unknown persons and during the course of investigation, on the basis of the information given by the spy, the petitioner got arrested in this case. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2025 and has got five criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

¶15

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for Regular bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No.267 of 2025 with a condition that petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned Trial Court till conclusion of the trial.

¶17

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶18

Harshita/-

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Singh @ Ashok Pd. Singh Vs Most. Sunita Devi and Ors.

Baby Devi @ Baby Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Arvind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Firoz Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Paswan @ Sanjay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Goswami Vs The State of Bihar