Suyash Siddhant Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57640 of 2024

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna

======================================================

Suyash Siddhant S/O Satyendra Narayan Singh R/O Prem Niwash C/O Ram Niwash Pandey, Prem Shila Pandey, Panch Mandir Road No. 2, Shivpuri, P.SShastri Nagar, Distt.- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kumari Jaya W/O Suyash Siddhant R/O K.V. Quater No. 6/66 Near Police Chauki, P.S- Kankarbagh, Distt.- Patna.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Singh, Sr. Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr. Parbeen Kr. Singh, Adv.

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 07-07-2025

¶13

1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of

¶14

the parties.

¶15

2. The present petition is being filed on behalf of

¶16

the petitioners for quashing of cognizance order dated 16.11.2022 learned Judicial Magistrate-1^st Class, Patna Sadar in Mahila P.S. Case No. 153 of 2021 by which learned trial court took cognizance for the offence u/s 498 (A), 341, 323, 406, 504 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. and Section 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶17

3. As per the case of prosecution O.P. No. 2

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57640 of 2024 dt.07-07-2025 2/5

¶19

married to petitioner on 29.01.2020 according to Hindu rites and customs. It is further alleged that her father-in-law demanded Rs. 15,00,000/- in order to marry his daughter, which was paid by her parent but later on she came to know that her sister-in-law was already married. It is further stated that petitioner/ husband was on medication for some mental illness and was also short tempered and of dominating nature. Her in-laws used to instigate the petitioner/ husband against her and also used to stop the O.P. No. 2 from talking to her parents. The petitioner used to sought at O.P. No. 2. It is further stated that on 26.09.2020 the brother of O.P. No. 2 came to house of accused persons in order to take O.P. No. 2 to her naihar (parental home) but he was ill-treated by the petitioner, and also tried to assault her brother by lathi. However the O.P. No. 2 managed to take some cloths and her Jewelry and reached her naihar. It is alleged that her mobile phone was left behind in her matrimonial home by mistake, from where accused persons shared some personal photos and Whatsapp chat with others. The O.P. No. 2 further stated that the petitioner and others did not give her any money for

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57640 of 2024 dt.07-07-2025 3/5

¶21

her expanses and she had to ask her parents for the same. The accused persons used to conspire against O.P. No. 2 and threatened to dissolve her marriage with petitioner/ husband.

¶22

4. Without exploring the available merits, it is straightway submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the dispute between the parties settled amicably where both the parties decided to dissolve their marriage as per provisions available under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against permanent alimony of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakh). It is submitted that acting upon the compromise parties preferred petition for mutual divorce under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna pending as Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 483 of 2025, which filed on 24.04.2025. It is also pointed out that in terms of compromise further payment of Rs. 5,00,000/(Rupees Five Lakh) was made to O.P. No. 2 before the learned trial/ family court through bank demand draft no. 436059 dated 17.04.2025 drawn at Kotak Mahindra Bank, Patliputra Housing Colony, Patna and as such a total payment

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57640 of 2024 dt.07-07-2025 4/5

¶24

of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh) already made to O.P. No. 2 in terms of compromise. It is submitted that the balance of payment of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh) shall be made to O.P. No. 2 by petitioner/husband at the time of second motion.

¶25

5. Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2 also approved the factum of compromise as submitted above and also the payment qua receiving of Rs. 10,00,000/- ( Rupees Ten Lakh) . It is jointly submitted that no any other criminal case including maintenance case is pending between the parties.

¶26

6. Considering the aforesaid factual submissions as the parties amicably resolved their issues and differences as discussed aforesaid, continuing present criminal proceeding before the learned court below would only amount to abuse of the process of court of law and, therefore, impugned cognizance order dated 16.11.2022 as passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-1^st Class, Patna Sadar in Mahila P.S. Case No. 153 of 2021 qua all accused persons including petitioner

¶27

is hereby quashed/ set aside with all its consequential

¶28

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57640 of 2024 dt.07-07-2025 5/5

¶29

proceedings.

¶30

7. Accordingly, the petition stands allowed.

¶31

8. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the

¶32

learned trial court forthwith.