Disposed

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2025CR. MISC./56509/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed an anticipatory bail application. It held that since the petitioner had already been granted liberty to approach the jurisdictional court for bail based on Arnesh Kumar precedent, there was no reason to entertain the new application, disposing it accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The bail application stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional court for bail.

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56509 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2024 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav, S/O Vinod Yadav, R/O Vill.Mathlohiyar, P.s.- Harsidhi, District- East Champran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Antima Devi, W/O Mukesh Kumar, D/O Rajendra Yadav, R/O Vill. at present Chhapkahiya, P.S.- Govindganj, Dist.- East Champaran

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 03-12-2025 Heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned Advocate for the opposite party no. 2.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Trial No. 1565 of 2025 arising out of Complaint Case No. C244 of 2024 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

After some argument learned Advocate for the informant submits that by the order impugned dated 06.06.2025 passed by the learned Session Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, the Court having taken notice of the fact that the case is punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, accordingly disposed off the same in the light of the decisions

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56509 of 2025(4) dt.03-12-2025 2/2

¶16

rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar [(2014) 8 SCC 273] and Satyendra Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. [S.L.P. (Cri) No.5191 of 2021] . However, despite the liberty accorded to the petitioner and the matter having been disposed off in the light of the aforenoted case, the petitioner preferred the present anticipatory bail.

¶17

Having considered the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the fact that the petitioner has already been given a liberty to approach before the jurisdictional court in the light of the decision aforenoted, this Court does not find any reason or occasion to entertain the present application. In view thereof, the present bail application stands disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to approach before the jurisdictional court in the light of the decisions afore-noted.

¶18

supratim/-

¶19

U T

¶20

(Harish Kumar, J)

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Mausam Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ramji Singh Vs Aryabhatta Knowledge University

Md. Alam @ Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Kailu Yadav @ Sachidanand Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Amar @ Arvind Yadav Vs The State of Bihar