Allowed

Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Raj v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2025CR. MISC./56459/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in CR. Misc. No. 56459 of 2024, allowed regular bail for the petitioner accused of murder under Sections 302/201 IPC. The petitioner was in custody since May 20, 2024, after being implicated during the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Gaya.

Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Raj Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56459 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2024 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Raj S/o Ravish Kumar R/o vill - Pura, P.S. - wazirganj, Distt. - Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, A.P.P. Mr. AK Jha, Advocate ======================================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

6 14-02-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered

¶13

for the offence punishable under sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, petitioner suspects that co-accused Ravish Kumar killed his son and threw the dead body by side of railway track with a view to conceal the offence.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Petitioner’s name has come in this case during course of investigation. However, none of the witness has stated that he saw the petitioner committing the offence. Co-accused, with

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56459 of 2024(6) dt.14-02-2025 2/2

¶17

similar allegation, has already been allowed pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order passed in Cr.Mis.No. 57282/2024. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Charge sheet has already been filed. Petitioner is in custody since 20.5.2024.

¶18

Learned counsel for the State and the informant oppose the prayer for bail.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Gaya in Wazirganj Police Station Case No. 284 of 2024.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

shashi/-

Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Raj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harsh Kumar @ Harsh Raj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadhana Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Mahton Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Chotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar