Dismissed¶18

Gutar Yadav @ Jitesh Yadav@ Jeetesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2025CR. MISC./5591/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory/pre-arrest bail REJECTED — assault/stone-pelting on police party with injuries to personnel; offences under IPC ss. 147, 148, 149, 272, 273, 353, 307 and Arms Act s. 27; PS Case No.-1/2024, Jayrampur, Sheikhpura; petitioner Gutar Yadav @ Jitesh Yadav @ Jeetesh Kumar; Patna High Court Cr. Misc. No.5591 of 2025(2), decided 02-04-2025 by Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.

What did the court decide?

In rejecting the prayer for pre-arrest bail, the court took into account the nature of the accusation and the fact that this petitioner, along with other co-accused persons, assaulted the police party due to which some police personnel sustained injury. ¶18

Gutar Yadav @ Jitesh Yadav@ Jeetesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5591 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2024 Thana- JAYRAMPUR District- Sheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gutar Yadav @ Jitesh Yadav@ Jeetesh Kumar Son of Rama Shray Yadav Resident of Village- Toigarh, Police Station- Jairampur, Distt.- Shikhpura

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shrinath Manjhi , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai , APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-04-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

the State .

¶14

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147 , 148 , 149, 272, 273 , 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

¶15

3 . As per the prosecution case , on the alleged date and time of occurrence , when informant along with other police officials reached the place of occurrence , in the meantime , all the accused persons started pelting stones at police party due to which some police personnel sustained injury . It is further alleged that local spy identified 14 persons including this petitioner. Further, Ishwar Yadav and dinesh Yadav were apprehended, but one Manoranjan singh came along with 20-

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5591 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2

¶17

30 persons and somehow managed to get the apprehended accused freed from the police custody .

¶18

Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that this petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted police party due to which some of the police personnel sustained injury , prayer for pre-arrest bail of this petitioner is rejected.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶20

Koushik/-

¶21

U T

Gutar Yadav @ Jitesh Yadav@ Jeetesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gutar Yadav @ Jitesh Yadav@ Jeetesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Babu Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan @ Gandhi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sahabuddin Khan @ Md. Sahabuddin Kha @ Md. Shahabuddin Khan Vs The State of Bihar