Rajesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55819 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2024 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas

======================================================

Rajesh Paswan, Male, aged about 30 years, aged about 30 years, S/o Chandrama Paswan, R/o Village - Mujrardh, P.S - Nokha (Dharmpura), District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sadanand Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Pushpa Sinha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 10-09-2025

¶12

Heard Mr. Sadanand Roy, learned counsel appearing

¶13

on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Nokha (Dharampura O.P.) P.S. Case No. 210 of 2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 323,341,307,325,504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the allegation made in the FIR, while the elder brother of the petitioner and his wife were quarreling, the petitioner intervened and assaulted in which the elder brother of the petitioner, who is the informant, sustained injury.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and as a matter of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55819 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3

¶18

fact, the informant and his wife were quarreling, in which the informant sustained injury and on the basis of false accusation, petitioner has been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that as per the opinion of the doctor, the injury Nos.1 and 2 sustained by the informant is simple in nature, whereas injury no.3 is grievous in nature but the said injury is not on the vital part of the body, rather the same is caused on left leg of the informant. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶20

Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR, the learned District Court is directed to call for the final opinion of the doctor in respect of the injury sustained by the informant and if the injury on the vital part of the body, i.e. the head is simple in nature, then in that case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Rohtas at Sasaram

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55819 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3

¶22

in connection with Nokha (Dharampura O.P.) P.S. Case No. 210 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

¶23

482(2) of the BNSS.

¶24