Prahlad Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2025CR. MISC./54155/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: bail; POCSO; kidnapping; Sections 363, 366A, 364/34 IPC; Section 8 POCSO Act; Section 183 BNSS victim statement; refusal of medical examination; speedy trial; custody since 14.10.2024; charge-sheet submitted; Prahlad Kumar v. The State of Bihar; Madhepura P.S. Case No. 886 of 2022; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54155 of 2025; dt.09-12-2025; Patna High Court; Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.; bail bond Rs.10,000/-; Section 437(3) Cr.P.C; Section 480(3) BNSS.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI cum Special Judge, (POCSO), Madhepura/concerned court, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 480(3) of BNSS. ¶¶28

Prahlad Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶28

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, named in the F.I.R. in Madhepura P.S. Case No. 886 of 2022 (Sections 363, 366A, 364/34 IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act) and in custody since 14.10.2024, should be released on bail.

¶¶14

Court's answer

On the factual submissions, the Court found that prima facie the allegations of kidnapping and sexual assault appear negated by the victim herself.

¶¶26

Ratio / Principle

Bail was warranted also because the investigation is already complete and the petitioner, in custody since 14.10.2024, faces very slow progress in trial suggesting it is not likely to conclude in the near future.

¶¶28

Key takeaways

The petitioner was directed to be released on bail in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 886 of 2022 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI cum Special Judge, (POCSO), Madhepura/concerned court, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C/Section 480(3) BNSS.ratio¶¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted. Patna High Court (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.), by order dated 09-12-2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.54155 of 2025, allowed bail to Prahlad Kumar, named in the F.I.R. in Madhepura P.S. Case No. 886 of 2022 registered for offences under Sections 363, 366A, 364/34 IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, who had been in custody since 14.10.2024. The allegation was kidnapping of the informant's minor daughter aged about 14 years for solemnizing marriage and committing sexual assault upon her. The Court noted the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS (per counsel) that she went along with the petitioner out of her own sweet will, and held that prima facie the allegations of kidnapping and sexual assault appear negated by the victim herself; coupled with completion of investigation and submission of the charge-sheet, and very slow trial progress suggesting conclusion was not likely in the near future, the petitioner was directed to be released on bail on a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two like sureties, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C/Section 480(3) BNSS.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54155 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-886 Year-2022 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prahlad Kumar S/o Gajendra Yadav R/o Vill- Morkahi, P.S.- Murliganj, DisttMadhepura

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Shilvrat Poddar @ Shilvant Poddar S/o Late Ramadhani Poddar R/o Mission Road, Bajrangbali Chowk, Ward No. 23, P.S. and Distt- Madhepura

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Adv : Ms. Pooja Prasad, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

ORAL ORDER

4 09-12-2025

Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

¶15

Madhepura P.S. Case No. 886 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 363, 366A, 364/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

¶16

The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 14.10.2024.

¶17

The allegation against the petitioner is to kidnap the minor daughter of informant aged about 14 years for solemnizing marriage and committed sexual assault upon her.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶19

submitted that victim while recording her statement under Section

¶20

183 of the BNSS categorically stated that she went along with

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54155 of 2025(4) dt.09-12-2025 2/3

¶22

petitioner out of her own sweet will and accompanied him for Hardi Gharoda, where she solemnized marriage with petitioner in Hanuman Temple. It is also pointed out that victim refused to join medical examination and, therefore, in want of corroborating material allegation of penetrative sexual assault appears doubtful. Arguing further, it is submitted that despite remaining in custody for more than a year matter is still pending for evidence and same is not likely to conclude in the near future. It is pointed out that petitioner cannot be kept behind bars for indefinite period of time in view of speedy trial as provisioned under Section 35(2) of the POCSO Act. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶23

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶24

Despite valid service of notice, none appeared on

¶25

behalf of informant.

¶26

In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as prima-facie allegation of kidnapping and sexual assault appears negated by victim herself, coupled with fact as investigation of this case already completed, where petitioner

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54155 of 2025(4) dt.09-12-2025 3/3

¶28

remains in custody since 14.10.2024 with very slow progress in trial suggesting that same is not likely to be conclude in the near future, accordingly petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 886 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI cum Special Judge, (POCSO), Madhepura/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 480(3) of BNSS.

¶29

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶30

S.Tripathi/-

¶31

U T

Prahlad Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prahlad Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen Sharma @ Naveen Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Alok Singh @ Alok Kumar Singh @ Putul Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mintu Mukhiya @ Mantu Mukhiya @ Mantu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md Mubarak Vs The State of Bihar

Anwar Miya @ Anwar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar