Dismissed¶18

Rajeswhwar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jan 2025CR. MISC./53976/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application rejected - Patna High Court - Criminal Miscellaneous No.53976 of 2024 - decided 17-01-2025 - Dr. Anshuman, J - arising out of Paharpur P.S. Case No. 399 of 2023 dated 25.09.2023 - District East Champaran - Sections 364, 120B and 34 of the I.P.C. - second bail application after rejection dated 16.04.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 10006 of 2024 - defence submission of circumstantial evidences and no material despite near-completion of witness examination - State confirmation that only I.O. remains unexamined - bail declined - Trial Court directed to expedite trial within six months.

What did the court decide?

None to the petitioner; bail rejected. Ancillary direction: Trial Court to expedite the trial within six months. ¶18

Rajeswhwar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53976 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-399 Year-2023 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajeswhwar Sah Son Of Late Khelawan Sah Village- Laguniya, Ps- Paharpur, Dist- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Priyanka Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 17-01-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 399 of 2023 dated 25.09.2023, lodged under Sections 364, 120B and 34 of the I.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 16.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10006 of 2024. He submits that almost all witnesses have been examined, except I.O. in this case and till date, no material has come. In this background that this case is completely of circumstantial evidences, keeping the petitioner in custody shall not solve any purpose.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State on the other hand

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53976 of 2024(4) dt.17-01-2025 2/2

¶17

opposes the prayer for bail and submits that all witnesses have been examined, only I.O. has not been examined as yet.

¶18

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, therefore, his bail petition is hereby rejected.

¶19

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial within six months.

¶20

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶21

sadique/-

¶22

U T

Rajeswhwar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeswhwar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geeta Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Safayee Mazadur Karamchari Sangh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamala Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nitish Kumar @ Aniket Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Izrail @ Md. Ijraile Vs the State of Bihar

Sahid Khan @ Shahid Khan @ Sahid @ Sajid @ Sazid Vs The State of Bihar