Dismissed

Sunny Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Aug 2025CR. MISC./51320/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order dated 11-08-2025, the Patna High Court rejected a bail application filed by Sunny Kumar. The Court declined to grant bail in connection with offences under Section 309(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, citing the prosecution case and the petitioner's confession.

What did the court decide?

The prayer for bail was rejected and the application was dismissed.

Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51320 of 2025

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East

¶4

Champaran

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Sunny Kumar, aged about 20 years, male, S/o Shiv Pujan Sah @ Shiv Poojan Prasad, R/o Village- Jhajhara, P.S.- Jitna, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 11-08-2025

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶15

and the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 40 of 2025, dated 03.02.2025, instituted for the offences under Section 309(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51320 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3

¶18

As per the prosecution case, some of the

¶19

miscreants tried to snatch the bag of the informant containing Rs. 1,15,000/-. When the informant protested it, the miscreants put him down upon the earth and opened fire. On account of fear, the informant left the bag. It further appears that on the basis of the information of the petitioner along with other co-accused, namely, Ujjawal Kumar, two loaded pistols have also been recovered. The supervising authority has also found the case true against the petitioner.

¶20

It appears from the impugned order that

¶21

the SDR of Mobile No. 8002336171 had been found at the place of occurrence and the said mobile number belongs to the petitioner. Further, the looted amount of Rs. 10,000/- has been recovered from the bed of the petitioner. The petitioner has also confessed his guilt in the alleged occurrence.

¶22

The learned A.P.P. for the State has

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51320 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3

¶24

opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶25

Having considered the facts and

¶26

circumstances of the case as also the allegations made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to

¶27

grant bail to the petitioner.

¶28

The prayer for bail is, accordingly,

¶29

rejected.

¶30

The application stands dismissed.

¶31

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶32

Praveen-II/-

¶33

U T

Sunny Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunny Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sakib @ Md. Sakib Faiyaz @ Sakib Faiyaz Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar @ Priyanshu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nandlal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar through Collector, Saharsa

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar