Rajendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51005 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2023 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajendra Yadav S/O Late Ramjee Yadav Resident of Village- Bihat, P.S.- New Barauni, Dist.- Begusarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 15-11-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 210 of 2023 for the offence under Sections 379, 411, 414, 120(B) and 34 of the I.P.C.

¶14

According to the prosecution story, after receiving secret information, the informant went to the banana field of Prabhas Jha, where it came to his knowledge that all the accused persons were involved in the illegal activity of oil theft and they were secretly selling the stolen oil. Stolen diesel was also recovered from that place and accordingly seizure list was prepared.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51005 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/3

¶17

the petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence rather he has falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty local politics. The prosecution story is totally false and concocted and investigation is still going on. Petitioner is a labour and works on daily wages. As per seizure list, the seized property is of Prabhas Jha and the same has no concern with the accused petitioner.

¶18

Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

¶19

From perusal of seizure list, it transpires that

¶20

place of seizure is the field of Prabhas Jha. Neither the petitioner nor any independent witness has made his signature on the seizure list. As per para 59 of the case diary, after completion of investigation, chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner by the police.

¶21

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶22

Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51005 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 3/3

¶24

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1^st , Naugachia, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kharik P.S. Case No. 210 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., further condition is that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)

¶26

Ankit Kumar/-

¶27

U T

Rajendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramakant Sah @ Ramakant Gupta Vs Sudhir Kumar Srivastava

In the Goods of Late Sumitra Devi Vs xx

Lalmani Singh Vs Angad Singh

Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vishwajeet Dwivedi @ Vishwajeet Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Kusum Devi Vs The State of Bihar