In a bail petition under the Arms Act, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for regular bail due to recovery of three loaded country-made pistols and his criminal antecedents.
Bail prayer rejected; trial court directed to expedite trial if already started.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50576 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-820 Year-2024 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna
======================================================
Rahul Raj S/o Late Rambinay Sharma R/o Village- Ajwan, P.S.- Naubatpur, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 18-08-2025
Heard Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50576 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/2
into custody in the present matter and the alleged firearms were
not recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
(Shailendra Singh, J)
BKS/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted regular bail in the present prosecution case.
Whether the recovery of arms and criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Raj
The State of Bihar
Shailendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
