Allowed

Anand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Feb 2025CR. MISC./5021/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an application for anticipatory bail for a petitioner implicated in offences under the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act. The court noted the petitioner claimed clean antecedents and lack of incriminating material, granting bail with a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount for a period of eight weeks.

Anand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5021 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- BARURAJ District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anand Kumar S/O Late Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Singh R/O Vill.Gokhula, P.S- Baruraj, Dist - Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazharul Hassan For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Rita Verma ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 13-02-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Baruraj P.S. Case No. 51/2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-B) (a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶13

The prosecution case, in brief, is that upon seeing the police party, the petitioner and another co-accused person tried to flee away from the place of occurrence but the coaccused person namely Aman Kumar was apprehended by the police who disclosed the name of the petitioner. It is further alleged that one motorcycle registered in the name of the petitioner was also seized from the place of occurrence.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5021 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 2/2

¶16

petitioner is falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has been made accused on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person. No incriminating materials has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

¶17

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

¶19

Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No. 5, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Baruraj P.S. Case No. 51/2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

Ranjeet/-

Anand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagendra Singh @ Nagen Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Laxman Kumar @ Laxman Sahni @ Bhulla Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sadhana Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar