Allowed¶23

Karan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jan 2025CR. MISC./49429/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.), CR. MISC. No.49429 of 2024, order dated 08-01-2025: regular bail allowed in Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 585/2023 (Sections 363, 366(A) IPC; Sections 8 & 12 POCSO Act). Custody since 03-10-2023; charge framed, trial not begun; bail on Rs. 10,000/- bonds with two sureties, family-member bailor condition, cancellation clause for default on two consecutive dates.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court, subject to conditions: one bailor to be own/close family member, and compulsory appearance on each trial date with liberty to the Trial Court to cancel bonds on default on two consecutive dates. ¶23

Karan Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49429 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-585 Year-2023 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Karan Manjhi Son of Sudama Manjhi R/O Vill.- Ichua, P.s.- Wazirganj, Dist.Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Dharmendra Manjhi Son of Indra Manjhi R/O Vill.- Bilauna (Ethawan), P.s.Wazirganj, Dist.- Gaya.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

7 08-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. None appears for the informant. Perused the case diary.

¶13

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 585 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code. Later Sections 8 & 12 of the POCSO Act were added.

¶14

3. Prosecution case in a nutshell is that petitioner has kidnapped the 15-years-old daughter of the informant and threatened the informant to do whatever he can.

¶15

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 03-10-2023. Petitioner

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49429 of 2024(7) dt.08-01-2025 2/3

¶17

bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶18

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that there is contradiction in the statements of the victim recorded under Section 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C. It is next submitted that medical report reveals that there is no sign of recent sexual assault. Learned counsel submits that victim had gone on her own will without any inducement or allurement by the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that charge in this case has been framed, but none of the witness has been produced to depose before the court below.

¶19

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. It is submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case under Sections 363, 366A of the IPC and Sections 8 & 12 of the POCSO Act.

¶20

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, there being no cogent material against the petitioner and charge being framed, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49429 of 2024(7) dt.08-01-2025 3/3

¶23

furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 585 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:

¶24

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶25

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

Karan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Babu Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Aklesh Kumar @ Akalesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumod Kumar @ Kumod Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Das Vs the State of Bihar

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Singh Vs The State of Bihar