Dipesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 13-10-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Chhaurandano (Mahuawa) P.S. Case No. 84/2024 dated 03.04.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 326, 307 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant along with his staff Karma Kumar was sitting at his shop, four miscreants riding on two motorcycles came and fired indiscriminately, on account of which, the informant sustained firearm injuries on his back. The informant has further alleged that Jay Prakash Thakur, Ram Pukar Giri, Sanjay Sah alongwith

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48973 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/3

¶16

4-5 unknown miscreants with a view to commit murder opened fired on the informant due to land dispute.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the course of investigation. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 24.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11615/2025. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one antecedent on which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2024.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that the informant has sustained three firearm injures.

¶19

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chhaurandano (Mahuawa) P.S. Case No. 84/2024 (G.R. No.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48973 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 3/3

¶21

300/2024), with the condition ;-

¶22

(i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically

¶23

present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶24

7. The application stands allowed.

¶25

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶26

Atul/-

¶27

U T

Dipesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yugal Rai @ Yugul Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Kumar @ Bhola Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Punam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Mandal @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar