Krishna Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratnakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 20-11-2025

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶13

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 448.200 litres of liquor from a car.

¶14

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48678 of 2025(4) dt.20-11-2025 2/3

¶16

create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his driver would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged.

¶17

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Benta P.S. Case No. 58 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶19

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48678 of 2025(4) dt.20-11-2025 3/3

¶21

antecedent of two cases in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

Sumit/-

¶24

U T

Krishna Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sharda Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Badal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhim Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Amarjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar