Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Pal Vs The State of Bihar

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354 and 34 of the I.P.C.

¶20

As per the F.I.R., there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant Manti Devi by means of lathi on her head due to which she sustained injury and he (petitioner) also assaulted the husband of malti Devi due to which he sustained hurt on his hand.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47498 of 2024(7) dt.06-02-2025 2/3

¶23

this case due to village politics and inimical relation between them. There is no occurrence as alleged in the manner has ever been taken place and false and concocted story has been made in order to falsely implicate other members of the family. It is further submitted that the other co-accused persons namely Vikram Pal and Suryakant Kumar Bhagat have been allowed Anticipatory bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge XI, Gaya passed in A.B.P No. 937 of 2024 vide order dated 07.05.2024. Learned counsel further submits that the informant Manti Devi sustained minor injury which is just bruise which was examined by doctor at N.M.C.H., Gaya who found the injury simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object.

¶24

Learned APP and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant oppose the prayer for bail.

¶25

Both the parties are neighbour and from para 6, 7 and 8 of the case diary, it appears that there is dispute between the parties regarding some other matter and allegation of molestation of sugandha kumari (daughter of the informant) is said to have been false by the witnesses. The said allegation is levelled against the petitioner is in order to make the case graver. The injury report mentioned in para 16 and 24 of the case diary suggests that injured has sustained simple injuries.

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47498 of 2024(7) dt.06-02-2025 3/3

¶27

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend the petitioner on the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶28

Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judical Magistrate-First Class, Gaya, in connection with Konch P.S. Case No. 57 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.,

¶29

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)

¶30

Ankit Kumar/-

Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Pal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Pal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Bharosh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Govind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Gulfan Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Kumar @ Anand Kumar Sah Vs the State of Bihar