Md. Anish v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jul 2025CR. MISC./45921/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.45921 of 2025, order dated 17-07-2025 by Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.: bail granted to Md. Anish in Excise P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025 (Muzaffarpur) under Sections 30(a), 32(3) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 367.920 litres of liquor recovered from ambulance; custody since 02.05.2025; no criminal antecedent; Section 103 Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 compliance raised by defence; bail bonds Rs. 10,000/- with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court, in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025. ¶¶24

Md. Anish Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45921 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Anish S/O Md. Noor Hasan Resident of Village- Thikahan Basudeva, PSKathaiya,Distt-Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bipin Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 17-07-2025

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶17

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 367.920 litres of liquor was recovered from ambulance.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45921 of 2025(2) dt.17-07-2025 2/2

¶20

The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 02.05.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶21

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

¶22

the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶24

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 518 of 2025.

¶25

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶26

Alok Verma/-

Md. Anish v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Anish v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikendra Sharma @ Sakin Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Shambhu Yadav @ Suman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Mistri @ Ashok Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Neeraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amijul @ Md. Amijul Vs The State of Bihar

Jiyabul Haque @ Jebla Vs The State of Bihar