Rakesh Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ayush Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 141 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 380, 414 & 511 of the Indian Penal Code

¶15

3. Prosecution case in a nutshell is that informant was taking rest in his room, in the meantime, petitioner entered into his house and took his wallet and mobile. On ruckus, petitioner was apprehended.

¶16

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13-05-2024. Petitioner bears five criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4345 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 2/3

¶18

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is next submitted that petitioner and informant are of the same village residing in the same vicinity and there was a previous enmity between both parties regarding money transaction. Petitioner has become the victim of the circumstances. It is alleged that mobile and wallet of the informant has been recovered from the petitioner’s possession, but the same is planted. It is lastly submitted that police after investigation has submitted charge sheet in this case.

¶19

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, manner of petitioner’s implication and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bajpatti P.S. Case No. 141 of 2024, subject to the following

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4345 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 3/3

¶23

conditions:

¶24

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶25

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶27

Raj Kishore/- U T

Rakesh Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Mukhiya v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Jha @ Babua Don Vs The State of Bihar

Nand Kishor @ Nand Kishore Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar @ Anil Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Narayan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar