Partly allowed

Robin Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Feb 2025CR. MISC./4338/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court considered a bail application regarding recovery of county-made liquor. Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner with criminal antecedents but granted to the other petitioner on specific conditional terms. No statutory provisions were explicitly applied or construed in this oral order.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed for Petitioner No. 1 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for eight weeks; rejected for Petitioner No. 2.

Robin Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4338 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Robin Singh Nagendra singh @ Nagen Singh R/O Village - Ahirauli Dan, P.S- Tareya Sujan District - Kushinagar ( U.P).

¶5

Nagendra singh @ Nagen Singh S/O Vishwanath Singh R/O Village - Ahirauli Dan, P.S- Tareya Sujan District - Kushinagar ( U.P).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 24-02-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶13

State.

¶14

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, 765 litres county made liquor has been recovered from the bank of Gandak river.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of these petitioners and they are not concerned with

¶17

the alleged recovery. Recovery has been made from an open place which is accessible to one and all.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4338 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that petitioner No. 1 has got one criminal antecedent and petitioner No. 2 has got four criminal antecedents of similar nature.

¶20

Considering the quantity of recovery and four criminal antecedents of similar nature, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 2 is rejected.

¶21

However, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner No. 1 in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-XIII-cum-Special Excise Court No. 1, Gopalganj in connection with Jadopur (Yadopur) P. S. Case No. 155 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

Navya/-

¶24

U T

Robin Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Robin Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aadarsh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shekhar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumkum Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar