Allowed

Shailendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jul 2025CR. MISC./42481/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an appeal for regular bail in a theft case involving unknown accused wherein the petitioner was identified as a co-accused, the High Court granted bail after considering the petitioner's long custody, young age, and lack of specific incriminating material against him.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in connection with PS Case No. 95/2023 on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Shailendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42481 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2023 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shailendra Kumar Son of Rampravesh Mahto village- Bijbani, ps- Jitwa (Ghorasahan), Dist- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-07-2025

¶13

Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for

¶14

the petitioner and Mr. Binod Kumar No.3, learned APP for the State.

¶15

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 95/ 2023 dated 02.03.2023 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 392 of the IPC.

¶16

The main submissions advanced by the petitioner’s counsel are that though the instant matter relates to the loot committed with the informant in respect of a sum of Rs. 1,98,000/-, tablet, bio-metric machine and the informant’s mobile by three motorcycle borne miscreants but the FIR has been registered against unknown and the name of this petitioner has surfaced during the course of investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused Sandeep Kumar, who

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42481 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/3

¶18

recorded his statement before the police which has got no evidentiary value and except this, there is no material against the petitioner to connect him in the commission of the alleged crime of loot. It is further submitted that the trial court has rejected the petitioner’s prayer for bail mainly considering his criminal antecedents and confessional statement of the coaccused, Sandeep Kumar however one other co-accused, Tuntun Kumar, whose name has also surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused, Sandeep Kumar has already been granted bail by the then co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 15.09.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62200 of 2023 and the petitioner’s case stands on the same footing with the said co-accused. It is lastly submitted that petitioner has been languishing in jail since 18.05.2023 and trial of the petitioner has started and charges were framed against him six months back and thereafter there is no progress in his trial.

¶19

Though the learned APP for the state has opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner but fairly accepts that as per the trial court’s order, except the criminal antecedents of this petitioner and confessional statement of co-accused, Sandeep Kumar there is no material against this petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions advanced by

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42481 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 3/3

¶22

the petitioner’s counsel and mainly taking into account the petitioner’s custody period, his young age as well as stage of his case, this court is inclined to grant the relief of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be released on bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 95/ 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-( Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

¶23

(Shailendra Singh, J)

¶24

BKS/-

¶25

U T

Shailendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Balram Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ishwari Das Vs The State of Bihar

Sharma sah Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Swarnkar Vs The State of Bihar