Reena Devi @ Pinki Devi Vs The State of Bihar

The State of Bihar ====================	... ... Opposite Party/s ==================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLAN	EOUS No. 1177 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :	Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLAN	EOUS No. 1850 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr. Priyanka Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :	Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLAN	EOUS No. 2102 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :	Mr. Rita Verma, APP
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLAN	EOUS No. 4158 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : ====================	Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ==================================
CORAM: HONOURABL MALVIYA	E MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND

¶42

ORAL ORDER

¶43

4 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶44

APP for the State.

¶45

The petitioners are in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 97, 143(5) and 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 75, 80, 81 and 84 of the J.J. Act.

¶46

As per prosecution story is that on 22-10-2024 when the informant was sitting at her office and doing work then one Rina Devi came and gave written application and stated that her husband, Ghanshyam Kumar taken to 80,000/friendly loan to Vikash Kumar and returned 60,000/- and demanded time for one month for return 20,000/- but Vikash Rai

¶47

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1177 of 2025(4) dt.08-05-2025 3/5

¶48

has not given time and on 16-09-2024 Birendra Ray and Vikash Rai came at his door and took away her both sons Lav @ Saurav and Kush Sarthan and threatened to repay the loan money, thereafter the informant along with police proceeded for enquiry the matter and arrested Birendra Rai and on enquiry about the both sons of Rina @ Pinki then who disclosed that Rina Devi @ Pinki and her sons Ghanshyam Kumar some months before came to sold her child and contacted Minta Devi, Sanju Devi and Sahdan Singh and they are in August 2023 one elder sons was sold to Vikash Rai at the house of Mina Devi, Manju Devi and Sahdan Singh in Rs. 80,000/- by Reena Devi @ Nikki Devi and her husband Ghanshyam Singh and both husband and wife sold that second son worth Rs. One lakh to Vikash Rai, thereafter the informant enquired the matter with Ghanshyam Kumar and on check her mobile video and other evidences of selling of child was found in deleted file, thereafter on further inquiry they admitted that they sold her son to Vikash Rai, after taken money, then the informant contacted with Vikash Kumar and called from P.S. then the said Vikash Rai along with the both minor children came at P.S., thereafter the informant taken Vikash Rai and lodged the case against all persons involved in sell purchase of child.

¶49

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1177 of 2025(4) dt.08-05-2025 4/5

¶50

Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that from perusal of the FIR, it appears that no such allegation for sale and purchase of child is made out against the petitioners and the petitioners are never involved in sale and purchase of the informant’s child and the statement of the Rina Devi and her husband Ghanshyam Kumar that no one kidnapped or abducted and trafficking their minor children and the entire case is creation of mind of the informant at the instance of petitioners enemies as stated in para 12 of the petition in Cr. Misc. No. 2102 of 2025. Petitioners have got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition and they are in custody since 13.12.2024, 24.10.2024, 24.10.2024 and 24.10.2024 respectively.

¶51

Learned APP appearing for the State opposes

¶52

the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶53

circumstances of the case and the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, be directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali

¶54

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1177 of 2025(4) dt.08-05-2025 5/5

¶55

at Hajipur in connection with Rajapakar (Baranti) P.S. Case No. 402 of 2024.

¶56

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶57

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶58

U

Reena Devi @ Pinki Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reena Devi @ Pinki Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raman Kumar @ Raman Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Madan Dom Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Minta @ Minta Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sanju Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Siya Ram Singh Vs Manjeet Kumar Singh