Allowed¶19

Raviranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Sept 2025CR. MISC./39742/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39742 of 2025, decided 10-09-2025 by Alok Kumar Pandey, J. Anticipatory bail application allowed in Barun P.S. Case No. 562/2024, District Aurangabad, under Sections 303(2) and 482(2) B.N.S.; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties; CJM Aurangabad; recovery of stolen motorcycle linked to Excise P.S. Case No. 154/2025 considered; petitioner not named in FIR.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: petitioner to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, on bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 562/2024, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. ¶19

Raviranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39742 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-562 Year-2024 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raviranjan Kumar S/O Sipahi Yadav Resident vill- Arsi Khurd, P.S.- Gurua, Dist.- Gaya.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adarsh Singh, Adv. Mr. Khalid Faizan. Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶7

4 10-09-2025

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶9

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶10

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 562/2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of the B.N.S.

¶11

As per prosecution case, the informant had parked his motorcycle bearing Registration No. JH03Q4635 near the Keshav High School. After sometime, it was discovered that the motorcycle was missing. FIR has been lodged against known.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner bears one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail, which is not similar to the present case. The

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39742 of 2025(4) dt.10-09-2025 2/3

¶14

petitioner is not named in the FIR. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He orally submits that during course of investigation, one stolen motorcycle was recovered and seized in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 154/2025 and in the said case, no material was produced with regard to confession of the petitioner in the present case and even the recovery was taken into account, it was not from the exclusive possession of the petitioner. In light of aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no offence is made out against the petitioner in the aforesaid section.

¶15

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 562/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39742 of 2025(4) dt.10-09-2025 3/3

¶18

482(2) of the B.N.S.

¶19

The application stands allowed.

¶20

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

amitkumar/-

¶22

U T

Raviranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raviranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durga Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Manu Singh @ Abhishek Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Mufassir Alam @ Mufasir Vs The State of Bihar

Balram kumar Vs The State of Bihar