Allowed¶18

Pintu Kumar @ Girdhari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2025CR. MISC./37805/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: regular bail; section 137(2) B.N.S.; section 183 BNSS victim statement; two minor girls missing; Ramkrishnanagar P.S. Case No. 570 of 2024; Patna; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37805 of 2025; Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey; order dated 02-09-2025; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two like sureties; Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No. 15, Patna; petitioner in judicial custody since 07.09.2024; no criminal antecedent; APP Ashok Kumar Singh for the State; counsel Sada Nand Roy for petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 570 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No. 15, Patna. ¶18

Pintu Kumar @ Girdhari Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37805 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2024 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pintu Kumar @ Girdhari S/o- Sri Jagarnath Munda Resident of Gulamali chak P.S- Bihta, Dist- Patna, A/P- Anand Nagar Ps- Sukhdeo Nagar DistRanchi

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Savita Devi C/o - Rajesh Sharma, In House of Sunil Yadav, Near Ashochak Patna Marble, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, District - Patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 02-09-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 137(2) of B.N.S.

¶13

The case of the prosecution is that two minor girls were missing.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during course of investigation, one of the minor girls has given her statement under Section 183

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37805 of 2025(3) dt.02-09-2025 2/3

¶16

BNSS wherein she has stated that she was having friendship with this petitioner and she has gone with him and that they have solemnized marriage. In para-96 of the case diary, it has also come that the victim has denied the medical examination. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has not kidnapped anyone rather he was in friendship with the victim and they have gone on their sweet will. From the statement of the victim recorded under section 183 BNSS, it is clear that she was on talking terms with the petitioner and she was caught by her mother talking with the petitioner. She was being thrashed by her mother. After this, she went on the pretext of purchasing of payal and fled away with the petitioner. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.09.2024.

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶18

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 570 of 2024 on furnishing

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37805 of 2025(3) dt.02-09-2025 3/3

¶20

bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

¶21

Magistrate, 1^st Class, Court No. 15, Patna.

¶22

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Shubham/-

¶24

U T

Pintu Kumar @ Girdhari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Kumar @ Girdhari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Sah @ Sanjay Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Rai @ Shambhu Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj @ Suraj Prasad @ Surat Prasad @ Surat Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhay Kumar @ Abhay Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Laxman Sah Vs The State of Bihar