Allowed

Md. Guddu @ Md. Haidar Ali v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jun 2025CR. MISC./36825/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest for offenses under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioners alleged false implication in a neighbor dispute involving assault and drug trafficking. The court directed surrender within four weeks upon furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Directing surrender within four weeks and enlarging petitioners on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Md. Guddu @ Md. Haidar Ali Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36825 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2024 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Guddu @ Md. Haidar Ali S/O Md. Akhtar R/O Urdu Bazar,Neem Chowk, PS-Laheriasarai, Distt-Darbhanga

¶5

Md. Arif S/O Md. Akhtar R/O Urdu Bazar,Neem Chowk, PS-Laheriasarai, Distt-Darbhanga

¶6

Md. Adil @ Adil S/O Md. Akhtar R/O Urdu Bazar,Neem Chowk, PSLaheriasarai, Distt-Darbhanga

¶7

Raja @ Injar Ali Raja @ Anjar Ali @ Md. Anjar Ali S/O Md. Aktar R/O Urdu Bazar,Neem Chowk, PS-Laheriasarai, Distt-Darbhanga

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhubala Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH

¶17

ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 20-06-2025

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

¶20

counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

¶21

The instant application for anticipatory bail has

¶22

been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in a case instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 110, 115(2), 118, 352, 351(2), 74 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

¶23

The prosecution case, in brief, is that when the

¶24

informant returned to his residence, he found the petitioners

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36825 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/3

¶26

along with other co-accused persons assembled there, allegedly abusing his wife by calling her a 'witch'. Upon the informant's protest, the petitioners allegedly assaulted him with a dagger, resulting in head injuries to both the informant and his wife. It is further alleged that the accused persons are involved in the sale of illegal drugs.

¶27

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶28

petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that both parties are neighbors, and due to an existing dispute between them, the present case has been instituted with false and concocted allegations. It is further submitted that, upon perusal of the injury reports of the informant and his wife, the injuries mentioned therein do not corroborate with the manner of assault as alleged in the prosecution version. Moreover, there is no specific or direct allegation against the petitioners. It is also stated in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

¶29

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36825 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 3/3

¶31

for the informant vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

¶32

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶33

in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case no. 414 of 2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶34

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J)

¶35

Nirajkrs/-

¶36

U T

Md. Guddu @ Md. Haidar Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Guddu @ Md. Haidar Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gauri Shankar Rai @ Gauri Shankar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anant Singh @ Anant Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Golu Mian @ Sarafraj Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Md Zakir Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Mintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar