Dismissed¶24

Sudhir Bhuiyan @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2025CR. MISC./36642/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No. 36642 of 2025, decided 01-08-2025 by Justice Alok Kumar Pandey: bail REJECTED under Section 302 IPC in Dumariya P.S. Case No. 24 of 2020 (District Gaya), trial S.Tr. No. 78 of 2021/504 of 2023; petitioner Sudhir Bhuiyan @ Sudhir Kumar in custody since 12.05.2020; third bail attempt after merit rejections dated 23.01.2023 (Cr. Misc. No. 27920 of 2022) and 21.06.2024 (Cr. Misc. No. 15183 of 2024); all prosecution witnesses examined, case at statement-of-accused stage per trial court letter no. 364 dated 24.06.2025.

What did the court decide?

In deciding the bail prayer, the Court took particular account of the fact that the petitioner's bail had already been rejected on merit on two earlier occasions, together with the trial court's report on the stage of trial. ¶22

Sudhir Bhuiyan @ Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36642 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2020 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sudhir Bhuiyan @ Sudhir Kumar S/o- Badri Bhuiyan Resident of VillageChatakpur, P.S.- Maigra, District- Gaya,

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajiv Nayan

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 01-08-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 78 of 2021/504 of 2023 arising out of Dumariya P.S. Case No. 24 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the IPC.

¶16

As per prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have stabbed his mother-in-law and the sole reason behind the said occurrence is that the informant brought her sister without permission of the petitioner as a result of which petitioner has abused and threatened to take the life of informant's sister on mobile and disconnected the call.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the present petitioner has already been rejected

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36642 of 2025(4) dt.01-08-2025 2/3

¶19

on merit by this Court on two occasions i.e. on 23.01.2023 and 21.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27920 of 2022 and Cr. Misc. No. 15183 of 2024 respectively. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2020 which is more than five years. He further submits that trial has not been concluded as yet and delay of trial is not in any way attributable to the present petitioner.

¶20

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that on two occasions the bail prayer of the petitioner was rejected on merit vide order dated 23.01.2023 and 21.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 27920 of 2022 and Cr. Misc. No.15183 of 2024 respectively. He further submits that there is no fresh ground for considering the bail prayer of the petitioner.

¶21

A report regarding stage of trial has been sought by this Court and in pursuance of the said direction, the trial court vide letter no. 364 dated 24.06.2025 has reported that all the prosecution witnesses have already been examined and the case is fixed for statement of the accused.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly keeping in view that earlier on two occasions bail prayer of the petitioner has already been rejected on merit

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36642 of 2025(4) dt.01-08-2025 3/3

¶24

as well as report of the trial court, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶25

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶26

vashudha/-

¶27

U T

Sudhir Bhuiyan @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Bhuiyan @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra Mishra @ Bupendra Ramswarup Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Basanti Kuwar Vs The State of Bihar

Vipin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Agrawal Vs The State of Bihar

Deo Pujan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jag Bihari Chaudhary, Vs The State of Bihar