Allowed

Rajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Aug 2025CR. MISC./36344/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under BNSS in a kidnapping case where the victim's Section 183 statement indicated she went with the petitioner consensually and had been recovered. Considering these circumstances, the High Court granted bail on furnishing a bond with conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- subject to Section 480(3) BNSS conditions.

Rajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36344 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2024 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajan Kumar S/o Naresh Pandit R/o Village- Pakrikanth, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 06-08-2025

¶11

Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

¶12

The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Sections 483 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS, 2023’) for grant of regular bail to the petitioner who is in custody in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 501 of 2024, lodged on 25.12.2024, under Sections 96/3(5) of the of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

¶13

As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against eight named accused persons including the present petitioner against whom allegation is that the petitioner and other accused

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36344 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/3

¶15

persons have kidnapped the grand-daughter of the informant with a view to sell.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.12.2024 having clean antecedent. Counsel submits that in the rejection order passed by the Sessions Court it has been acknowledged that the alleged victim has been recovered and in her statement under Section 180 and 183 of the "BNSS" she has accepted that she went with the petitioner with consent.

¶17

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that case-diary may be called for.

¶18

In her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS the victim has accepted that she went with the petitioner with consent.

¶19

In the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of I/C. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 501 of 2024,

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36344 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 3/3

¶21

subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 480(3) of the BNSS , 2023.

¶22

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶23

Mkr./-

¶24

U T

Rajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subodh Kant and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dwarika Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arbind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rahul Kumar @ Mom Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Sai Vs The State of Bihar

Salim Miya @ Salimuddin Vs The State of Bihar