Dismissed¶8

Chandrashekher Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2025CR. MISC./36327/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36327 of 2025; order dt. 21-08-2025; Justice Satyavrat Verma; petitioner Chandrashekher Kumar (then Managing Director, M/s Anant Homes Pvt. Ltd.); PS Case No. 597/2023, Kotwali P.S., Patna; Section 35 BNSS notice not yet issued; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to refile; SHO and IO personal appearance dispensed with.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if need arises; personal appearance of the S.H.O., Kotwali Police Station, and the Investigating Officer dispensed with. ¶8

Chandrashekher Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36327 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2023 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandrashekher Kumar Son of Late Surendra Nath Verma The then Managing Director, M/s Anant Homes Pvt. Ltd., R/o- South Mandiri, P.S.Kotwali, Distt.- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 21-08-2025

¶10

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶11

APP for the State, Shri Chandra Bhushan Prasad and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant, Shri Sangeet Deokuliar.

¶12

2. The S.H.O, Kotwali Police Station and the Investigating Officer of the case, in compliance of the order dated 20-8-2025, are present in the Court.

¶13

3. The SHO submits that he has recently joined and was not aware of the case.

¶14

4. The Investigating Officer accepts that notice under Section 35 BNSS has not been issued to the petitioner.

¶15

5. The SHO assures the Court that by tomorrow notice under Section 35 BNSS shall be served on the petitioner.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36327 of 2025(4) dt.21-08-2025 2/2

¶17

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the event if notice under Section 35 BNSS is served on the petitioner, he will accept the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner thus submits that for the present, petitioner does not have any apprehension of arrest hence seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with liberty to file afresh, if need arises.

¶18

7. Permission is accorded.

¶19

8. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

¶20

9. The personal appearance of the S.H.O, Kotwali Police Station and the Investigating Officer of the case, is dispensed with.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

Sumit/-

¶23

U T

Chandrashekher Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrashekher Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mashkoor Azam Vs The State of Bihar

Bhishan Singh @ Bhisham Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nanku Mian @ Shamshad Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Bharosh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rizwan Aalam @ Md. Rizwan Ansari Vs The State of Bihar