Surya Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36262 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2025 Thana- Mufassil District- Khagaria

======================================================

Surya Kumar @ Suraj Kumar son of Daya Shankar Yadav @ Dayashankar Yadav R/O- Nakkahumandal Tola PS- Muffasil District- Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 18-06-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

2. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Muffasil Police Station Case No. 53 of 2025, dated 12.04.2025, disclosing offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶13

3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that the police, on secret information that the petitioner and other accused person are indulged in selling illicit liquor, which has been kept near the house of the coaccused Vikas Kumar @ Anand Kumar at Nankhu Mandal Tola, reached at the place of occurrence and saw that one person, on seeing the the police, started fleeing away and succeeded in it. Upon search, the police

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36262 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3

¶15

recovered 42.750 liters of foreign liquor from five cartons hidden under hay and plastic.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to oblique motive and village politics. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of secret information. He next submits that illicit liquor has not been been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner and/or from the premises belonging to him. Rather, illicit liquor has been recovered from near the house of co-accused Vikas Kumar @ Anand Kumar, which is open space accessible to all and sundry.

¶17

5. Regards being had to the submission made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis secret information and illicit liquor has not been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, rather, the same has been recovered from open space accessible to all and sundry, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶18

6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶19

7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36262 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3

¶21

or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise I, Khagaria, in connection with Muffasil Police Station Case No. 53 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶23

ashwani/-

¶24

U T

Surya Kumar @ Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surya Kumar @ Suraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Educational and Welfare Society Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs Baijnath Mestar

Umakant Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Kishori Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Ramanuj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar