Allowed

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 May 2025CR. MISC./3558/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a liquor-related case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, directing his release upon arrest or surrender within four weeks upon furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on anticipatory bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks; bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties.

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3558 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-610 Year-2022 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinay Kumar S/o Moti Singh Resident of Village- Sarosher, P.O.- Khuduru, P.S.- Kochas, District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Siddharth Harsh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 02-05-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sasaram Muffsil P.S. Case no.610 of 2022 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, 900 ml of foreign liquor was recovered from a motorcycle which was driven by accused Gobind Upadhyay and Deepak Kumar.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and cause of his false implication is only for the reason that he happens to be the registered owner of the seized motorcycle. No recovery has been made from the conscious

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3558 of 2025(3) dt.02-05-2025 2/2

¶17

possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of supplementary affidavit which is taken on record, submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

¶18

The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

In view of the facts of the case that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as also no recovery has been made from physical or conscious possession from him, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Sasaram Muffsil P.S. Case no.610 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 2-cum-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.

¶20

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

¶21

harsh/- U T

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikky kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Dablu kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Faiyaz Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Ray @ Amrendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar