Najrul Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34240 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Najrul Son of Shafiur @ Matiur Rahman R/O Vill.- Tegharia Ward no. 01, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Patna

¶8

Nausari Wife of Najrul R/O Vill.- Tegharia Ward no.1, P.S.- Thakurganj, Dist.- Kishanganj. At present- D/O Aminuddin, R/O Vill.- Satal Istamrar, P.S.- Bahadurganj, Dist. Kishanganj.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms/Mrs. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. Mr Diwakar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 20-01-2025

¶12

Pursuant to order of this Court, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Center of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (Report kept at flag ‘M’).

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2.

¶14

The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 325, 498A/504 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶15

Prosecution case in brief is that opposite party no.2 was married with the petitioner nearly eight years back. After marriage, this petitioner along with other accused persons started demanding dowry and on non-fulfillment of the same they used to assault and torture her. Lastly, accused persons

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34240 of 2024(6) dt.20-01-2025 2/3

¶17

ousted opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial house.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case because he happens to be husband of opposite party no.2. Petitioner is a labourer. However, petitioner is ready to give Rs. 3000/-per month to opposite party no.2 by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month.

¶19

Learned counsel for the State as well as opposite party no.2 oppose the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner, being husband of opposite party no.2, in connivance with his family members, subjected her to harassment and cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and also ousted her to her parents’ house. It is further submitted that she has a child and has no means of livelihood and is on the verge of starvation.

¶20

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as condition of opposite party no.2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in Mahila Police Station Case No. 07 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

¶21

(i) Opposite party no.2. would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

¶22

(ii) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid interim

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34240 of 2024(6) dt.20-01-2025 3/3

¶24

relief per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no.2.

¶25

(iii) In case, petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amount of temporary relief/solace for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

¶26

(iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

¶27

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶28

shashi/-

¶29

U T

Najrul v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Najrul v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranju Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Santu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Ballabh Yadav @ Raj Ballabh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Yadav @ Sulendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar