Makhan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivnandan Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 22-08-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

¶14

connection with Gwalapara P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, while the informant’s sister had gone for attending the call of nature at around 08:00 PM, the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner along with four to five other persons caught hold of her and strangulated her to death.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR itself would reveal that there is general and omnibus allegation against five named and four to five unknown persons and there is neither any eyewitness to the alleged occurrence nor

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32758 of 2025(3) dt.22-08-2025 2/3

¶18

a single independent witness has supported the case of the prosecution. The entire case is based on suspicion and the informant himself also does not seem to be an eyewitness to the alleged occurrence. He further submits that out of two persons arrested by the Police, co-accused Balo Mandal @ Ballu Mandal had admitted his guilt which would be evident from his confessional statement recorded before Police which is recorded at paragraph no. 17 of the case diary and he accepted the sole responsibility of strangulating the informant’s sister upon himself due to her activities which was bringing bad name to the family. He next submits that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and is about sixty years of age having clean antecedent. He further submits that two other female members of the family have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 23.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32832 of 2025.

¶19

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made on behalf of the parties and also taking into consideration the fact

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32758 of 2025(3) dt.22-08-2025 3/3

¶22

that co-accused Balo Mandal admitted his guilt in the form of a sole responsibility and he is in custody and the entire case is based on suspicion, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Udakishunganj, in connection with Gwalapara P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024 , subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶23

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

¶24

Shahnawaz/-

¶25

U T

Makhan Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Makhan Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Natik Anjum @ Md. Natique Anjum Vs The State of Bihar

Bijli Das @ Bijali Das Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kaushal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar