Allowed

Rishu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 May 2025CR. MISC./32553/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after recovery of 1280 litres of spirit from a pick-up van; petitioner claimed he was merely the driver with no conscious possession. The court granted regular bail with conditions including cooperation in trial and verification of criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise-I, Aurangabad, subject to conditions.

Rishu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32553 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2025 Thana- KUTUMBA District- Aurangabad

¶3

====================================================== Rishu Kumar S/o RAjeshwar Singh R/o Village- Kachara, P.S.Hussainabad/Japla, District- Palamu (Jharkhand)

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukul Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 20-05-2025

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner makes a prayer for bail in connection with Kutumba P.S Case No.56 of 2025 registered for offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

The First Information Report and the seizure list would indicate that there is a total recovery of 1280 litres of spirit from a Mahindra pick-up van and the petitioner is said to be the driver of the alleged vehicle.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the nothing has been recovered from the physical and conscious possession of the petitioner and he was merely the driver of the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32553 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/3

¶15

said seized vehicle and neither the vehicle nor the seized liquor belongs to the petitioner. Further, there is no independent witness to the seizure list and hence, the mandatory provisions of search and seizure have not been complied with. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the petitioner is in custody since 30.03.2025.

¶16

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail application.

¶17

In view of the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge of Excise-I, Aurangabad, in connection with Kutumba P.S Case No.56 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

¶18

(i) the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation/trial.

¶19

(ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32553 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 3/3

¶21

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

¶22

sharun/-

¶23

U T

Rishu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Saddam Hussain @ Saddam Hussain Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Thakur @ Ranjeet Kumar Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Shankar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Bhuiya Vs The State of Bihar