Md. Raja Khan @ Md. Raja v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Sept 2025CR. MISC./32458/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.32458 of 2025, decided 03-09-2025 by Justice Jitendra Kumar. Anticipatory bail allowed in Jamui P.S. Case No. 739 of 2024 (B.N.S. ss.126(2), 115(2), 110, 303(2), 352, 3(5)); grounds: no specific allegation of assault against petitioner, simple injury; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two like sureties within eight weeks; conditions u/s 482(2) B.N.S.S., 2023 plus cancellation clauses for concealed antecedents and false statement re previous bail petition.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner to be enlarged on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, subject to Section 482(2) B.N.S.S., 2023 conditions and two additional cancellation conditions. ¶¶22

Md. Raja Khan @ Md. Raja Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32458 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-739 Year-2024 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Raja Khan @ Md. Raja, son of late Md. Musha Khan @ Md. Mustak Resident Of Village- Satgama, PS- Jamui, District- Jamui

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 03-09-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, apprehending his arrest, in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 739 of 2024 dated 17.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S.

¶15

As per allegation, the petitioner and other coaccused surrounded the informant and co-accused Md. Adnan assaulted him with iron rod. It is further alleged that the petitioner snatched chain of the informant worth Rs.80,000/-. The reason behind altercation is previous enmity between the informant side as well as petitioner side.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32458 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 2/3

¶18

petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner that he has made any assault upon the informant. The allegation regarding snatching chain is superficial addition in the FIR to make the case serious. He also submits that as per medical report, injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature.

¶19

It is also stated in paragraph No. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

¶20

It has further been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has been made accused in another case in which he is on bail.

¶21

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid fact that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner and simple nature of injury allegedly caused by the accused side, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32458 of 2025(3) dt.03-09-2025 3/3

¶24

bail bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below, in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 739 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:

¶25

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent despite his knowledge of the same.

¶26

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶27

(Jitendra Kumar, J)

¶28

S.Ali/-

¶29

U T

Md. Raja Khan @ Md. Raja v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Raja Khan @ Md. Raja v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Adhik Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Ijhar Alam Vs Sabnam Praveen

Bijendra Prasad @ Bijendra Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Lallan Ram @ Lallan Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Laxmi Narayan Pandey Vs The State of Bihar