Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-02-2025

¶11

Heard the parties.

¶12

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and

¶13

apprehending his arrest in connection with Baliya P.S. Case No. 222 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under

¶14

Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is to be

¶16

involved in illegal trading of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 349.50 litres of IMFL appears to be recovered from the possession of co-accused.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the alleged recovery of illicit

¶18

liquor was made from an open field of one Shree Ram Tanti,

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3196 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 2/3

¶20

where during course of recovery one co-accused namely, Harish Kumar was apprehended, who named this petitioner as to keep the recovered illicit liquor jointly in the field and on the basis of his statement, the petitioner was implicated with present case. It is submitted that the recovery admittedly was made from an open field accessible by general public and same not appears made from the physical possession of this petitioner. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case where he is in on bail.

¶21

Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.

¶22

In view of aforesaid factual submission as

¶23

recovery of illicit liquor prima-facie not appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner, coupled with the fact that alleged recovery was made from an open field, accordingly, petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail, furnishing bail

¶24

bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3196 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2025 3/3

¶26

learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Act 2^nd , Begusarai /concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Baliya P.S. Case No. 222 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, with further condition:-

¶27

“(i) That accused/petitioner shall not involve in the similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which the State shall be at liberty to move before the Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.”

¶28

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶29

Sudha/-

¶30

U T

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Heeru @ Heerwa @ Md. Heerwa @ Heeraba Vs The State of Bihar

Kampani Yadav @ Kampni Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pinku Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonal Kumar @ Sonal Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bali Mukhiya @ Bali Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Umashankar Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar