Dismissed¶22

Taj Ali @ Md. Taj Ali v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Sept 2025CR. MISC./28973/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application rejected; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.28973 of 2025; Dr. Anshuman, J.; order dated 19-09-2025; Ara Town P.S. Case No. 366 of 2023; District Bhojpur; Sections 341, 307, 332, 333, 353 IPC; Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27, 35 Arms Act; Additional Sessions Judge-XIII; custody since 16.09.2023; charge not framed; trial court report - counsel unavailable; committed 08.08.2025; recovery of Rs. 4,99,500/- with country made pistol and three live cartridges; five pending criminal cases.

What did the court decide?

This Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner; the bail application is rejected. ¶22

Taj Ali @ Md. Taj Ali Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28973 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-366 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Taj Ali @ Md. Taj Ali S/o Md. Kapil @ Md. Fahim Kapil Resident of vill - Rauza Mohalla, P.s.- Ara Town, Distt.- Bhojpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 19-09-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 366 of 2023, lodged on 11.05.2023, under Sections 341, 307, 332, 333 & 353 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, pending before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Bhojpur at Ara.

¶17

As per the prosecution, F.I.R. has been lodged against the accused persons from whose possession Rs. 4,99,500/- along with one country made pistol and three live cartridges has been recovered along with other materials.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28973 of 2025(4) dt.19-09-2025 2/2

¶20

submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.09.2023 and, till date, even the charge has not been framed. He further submits that there are five criminal cases pending against the petitioner, in which he is pursuing bail. He further submits that on the previous occasion, this Court had directed the trial court to intimate under what circumstances the charge has not been framed against the petitioner.

¶21

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the aforesaid report has been received, and it transpires from the said report that counsel for the accused was not available, therefore, arguments could not be heard on the point of charge. He further submits that the case was committed on 08.08.2025.

¶22

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶23

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶24

Aman Kumar/-

Taj Ali @ Md. Taj Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taj Ali @ Md. Taj Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Soren Vs The Uco Bank and Ors.

Virendra Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Mohd. Rizwan @ Md. Rizwanul Haque Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Gulzar Vs The State of Bihar

Saheb Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Abhinab Raj Vs The State of Bihar