Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a cheating/land-sale case (Sections 406, 420, 506, 384 IPC). Informant's counsel noted breach of an earlier court undertaking. With no petitioner counsel present, the court rejected anticipatory bail.
None granted; anticipatory bail rejected with direction to surrender within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28876 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-786 Year-2023 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
Anmol Yadav Son of Late Sadanand Yadav Resident of Village- Panjarkatta, Ward No. 02, P.S.- Narpatganj, Dist.- Araria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP For the Informant : Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
4 17-01-2025
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though
Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, representing the informant and learned APP for the State is present.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28876 of 2024(4) dt.17-01-2025 2/2
on the same day. Further, Rs. 1,75,000/- was transferred again in the Account which followed Rs. 2,00,000/- in cash on 7.6.2022, totalling Rs. 8,75,000/-.
rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in Forbesganj PS Case No. 786 of 2023 under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 384 IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Anmol Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
