Yadu Nath Singh @ Yadunath Singh @ Bhulla Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27983 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2024 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani

======================================================

Yadu Nath Singh @ Yadunath Singh @ Bhulla S/O Late Hiralal Singh Village- Kanhauli, Police Station- Khajauli, District- Madhubani

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ===============	... ... Opposite Part =======================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s For the State For the Informant ===============	: Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate =======================================
CORAM: HONOU MISHRA	RABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 08-09-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as also learned counsel for the informant. Perused the case diary.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 127 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 & 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 & 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Prosecution case, in short, is that on 19.06.2024, informant alleged that while inspecting uprooted pillars near his house, accused persons including petitioner attacked him and others, during which petitioner fired and fatally injured the informant’s brother. Neighbours rushed on hearing gunshots,

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27983 of 2025(5) dt.08-09-2025 2/3

¶15

whereas the accused fled, and the injured was taken to PHC Khajauli where he was declared dead.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 20-06-2024. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶17

It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties are agnates and there is subsisting land dispute between them. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Postmortem report corroborates the prosecution case, wherein cause of death is hemorrhage and shock caused by gunshot injury. There is direct allegation of firing against the petitioner, hence, he does not deserve the privilege of bail.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being direct allegation of firing against the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27983 of 2025(5) dt.08-09-2025 3/3

¶21

petitioner, which fact is duly corroborated by the postmortem report, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

¶22

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible without any undue delay and unnecessary adjournments.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

Raj Kishore/- U T

Yadu Nath Singh @ Yadunath Singh @ Bhulla v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yadu Nath Singh @ Yadunath Singh @ Bhulla v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mehabub Vs The State of Bihar

Tanik Mahto @ Tanik Mahton Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnikant Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Bipul Singh @ Bipul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Amarnath Singh @ Nankhu Singh @ Nandu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ahmad Hussain @ Bhakolwa Vs The State of Bihar